- 1080P CIVILIZATION BEYOND EARTH BACKGROUNDS 1080P
- 1080P CIVILIZATION BEYOND EARTH BACKGROUNDS DRIVERS
1080P CIVILIZATION BEYOND EARTH BACKGROUNDS 1080P
Ultimately, I was only able to test most of the notebooks at 1080p Ultra and High settings.
1080P CIVILIZATION BEYOND EARTH BACKGROUNDS DRIVERS
The MSI GT70 with 880M on the other hand doesn't use the Intel GPU for the DisplayPort connection, effectively bypassing Optimus it seems I need to go back and retest at some point, but it will probably be a while.Įven the MSI GS60 with its 3K panel wouldn't work at the native resolution, so that's at least one bug to fix (though whether it's in the game, the Intel drivers, or the NVIDIA drivers I couldn't say). 1920x1080), everything is okay.Īs for the GE60, it only has an HDMI output, so I couldn't test at anything above 1920x1080 regardless.
![1080p civilization beyond earth backgrounds 1080p civilization beyond earth backgrounds](https://i.pinimg.com/originals/69/39/c1/6939c17f77839cb419fbdeeab1159d59.jpg)
![1080p civilization beyond earth backgrounds 1080p civilization beyond earth backgrounds](https://venturebeat.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/ogn.jpg)
I don't know if the issue is with the Intel GPU at High DPI resolutions or an Optimus problem or something else, but if you load the game with a lower resolution (e.g. Civilization: Beyond Earth would simply crash during the loading process, possibly due to problems with video decoding. Moving over to the notebook side of things, first I need to point out a problem that came up in testing: the MSI GS60 basically wouldn't work properly at higher resolutions, even with an external display. (Note that the MSI GE60 GPU is basically the same as a GTX 750 Ti, so you can use that as a reference point for $120-$150 GPUs.) Notebook Performance Even at 1080p High, it's still languishing in the sub-30 FPS realm you'll need to drop the quality and/or resolution another notch to get above 30FPS with that level of hardware. Lest anyone get the idea that Civilization: Beyond Earth isn't a taxing game, do pay attention to the R7 250X results. Our overall rankings remain basically unchanged – and that holds for testing at 1920x1080 as well (for both Ultra + 4xMSAA and High + No AA settings). However, since Civilization isn't exactly the sort of game where fast reflexes are required, the occasional stutter won't be too much of a problem. There are definitely quieter Radeon R9 GPUs, but even then they're going to be hard pressed to match the GTX 970 or 980.ĭropping to 2560x1440, nearly all of our tested GPUs break the 30FPS mark with room to spare, though minimum frame rates can at times be in the sub-20 range. What the performance figures don't necessarily show – and what is immediately obvious when you're swapping between GPUs – is just how loud the R9 280/280X/290X blower GPUs can get! It's seriously almost laughable how hard the fans are working on my AMD GPUs.
![1080p civilization beyond earth backgrounds 1080p civilization beyond earth backgrounds](http://images.gamersyde.com/image_sid_meier_s_civilization_beyond_earth-24700-2926_0011.jpg)
Somewhat surprisingly, even the venerable R9 280X is able to break the 30FPS mark, at least with the slight boost it receives courtesy of Mantle. Meanwhile the GTX 970 and GTX 780 are basically in a dead heat for third place (the R9 290, which I don't have, would likely come in slightly ahead of the GTX 970). In terms of pure bang for the buck, the R9 290X is of course the winner, since it can now be had for well under $400. The GeForce GTX 980 tops our charts for performance (AMD says their R9 290X 8GB card should be slightly faster – though that claim was made before NVIDIA released their Game Ready 344.48 drivers), with the R9 290X coming in second place. I wouldn't expect many games to run well at a 4K resolution with Ultra quality settings and 4xMSAA, especially when running a single GPU, but Civilization: Beyond Earth proves to be relatively forgiving.